@mathix maybe you can make it clear on the website that this doesn't create app/play store apps, as most people probably think about them when they read "turn any website into an app".
From the github readme[0]:
> FTWA uses the --app='https://app.example' parameter with Chromium-based browsers to launch a website in "app mode".
> [...]
> When choosing linux as target OS, FTWA generate a shell script that will create a .desktop file and it's icons.
* The Firefox (BETA) entry does not work on default Ubuntu installs, where Firefox is a Snap. Yes, snap bad, bla bla bla, but it still remains one of the most likely way Firefox will be installed on Ubuntu. This comes from the fact that your script attempts to locate the profile folder in ~/.mozilla/firefox, whereas snaps stores them in ~/snap/firefox/common/.mozilla/firefox/.
* New profiles unfortunately don't share logins on Firefox, which means your app is disconnected at first. Not a big deal, but could maybe be changed by copying some things from the default profile ?
* Firefox does not display _any_ titlebar when ran in this way.
Love the idea. There's many times where I'd like something to have a bit more "privilege" on my toolbar than what a regular tab (even pinned) gets.
Since Mozilla has started to provide an official Debian-style repository there is no reason to use snap on Ubuntu any more. Well, except if some users don't know or don't care to switch.
>there is no reason to use snap on Ubuntu any more. Well, except if some users don't know or don't care to switch.
Also known as "90% of your users". Defaults stick, and there's nothing bad enough about snaps that i'd waste time of my day adding the debian repo, trying to switch my profiles over, etc.
One aspect is that the server side is not free software. So only Canonical can reasonably host a repo of snaps.
That was enough for me not to look into the technical merits of the clientside implementation. The few experiences I had with snap was that programs were starting slowly (Firefox) and e.g. GPU acceleration did not work (vlc). Not sure how good the sandboxing is. But I run my Firefox sandboxed by firejail and the overhead can not be felt in daily usage.
Ubuntu has replaced the deb version of Firefox with Snaps a few times on my computer.
On at least 3 occasions, I became aware of this when I would open Firefox and nothing would happen, except a message that "Firefox is already running". The only resolution was to install the deb Firefox package.
A couple months ago, I needed to do a fresh install since my system got borked during the upgrade to 24.04 LTS. As usual, the Firefox snap package was installed, so I decided to give it a try.
To its credit, it actually works this time. However, it will not save images on right click or open Zoom meeting links in the desktop client. I am fairly certain this problem would disappear if I switched back to the deb package, but it's not a big enough hassle for me to bother. I can live with some workarounds for now.
Overall, I don't mind snaps, but the Firefox snap has been far more trouble than it's worth.
- Yes I could create a second firefox preset for snap installs
- I would prefer not to touch such sensible files, but will give instructions on how to do it manually
I had written a similar program (but very barebone compared with what you've made), with Firefox only. The way I dealt with profile, is to specify the full path of the profile, rather than a name. This way, I don't have to know where Firefox is searching for profiles, and I can keep all the additional profiles in a separate directory, so they don't mix with normal profiles and don't clog up profile manager.
I just switched to Firefox and struggled with this exact functionality. The posted site ships a script for curl|sh that creates a new firefox profile with a custom userChrome.css.
I ended up writing a firefox extension to open up URLs in a new "popup" window[1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/web-app-maker.... I just checked it on Windows (usually using linux) and the popup window type does not allow the maximize button to work. Oh well...
There's an excellent extension that makes this pretty simple to manage. Additionally the windows it creates have some pwa specific settings, like how links should be handled.
For people who want a "separate window" on Chrome osX (at least), you can go on the website, click on the "..." next to your profile picture, then "Cast, save and share" > "Install website as app"
It does the same, but runs as a "separate app" so that cmd+Q only exits the app
Yes, it's pretty much the same for macOS I guess. On linux it's pretty different, I was using .desktop files over PWAs for years because of their bad UI on Linux.
So I did this, turned out it's not only just Firefox without the browser UI, but it also bricked my actual Firefox browser and now it doesn't connect to the internet.
I would like to have the complete opposite. Turn any app into a website so that I don't need to download them, and can just access them through my browser.
1. Does this make the apps show up as separate windows in Alt+Tab and a Dock etc? (FWIW I use GNOME + Dash to dock + Wayland)
2. Let's say you have a mail app and you click a link. Does that link open in the separate default browser?
I remember trying these command line options for Brave/Chrome, but I couldn't find a way where both of the above were working and thus they didn't feel like proper apps. I've only been using this for something like Apple Music, where I never click on any link that takes me outside. For everything else, like mail and notes, I've been using pinned tabs, but that feels suboptimal too.
2. This could do the trick for you https://askubuntu.com/a/251738/1163389 make it point to the desktop file that ftwa created in this folder: ~/.local/share/applications
Why did you build this with a server? Since you suggest folks introspect the script anyway, you could simply generate it in the browser and have the user download it. Then you could run this at zero-cost.
This was just a side project, I was using .desktop files to launch some websites and thought it was still pretty unknown by most people. So I created this website.
This is really cool! Any chance of adding support for the Arc browser? Right now, Chrome allows for some websites (WhatsApp, Spotify, YouTube Music) to be made into "apps" already via PWAs. Arc - which is based on chromium, for some mysterious reason, chooses to not support PWAs so this would be extremely useful for Arc!
Cool stuff!
@mathix maybe you can make it clear on the website that this doesn't create app/play store apps, as most people probably think about them when they read "turn any website into an app".
From the github readme[0]:
> FTWA uses the --app='https://app.example' parameter with Chromium-based browsers to launch a website in "app mode".
> [...]
> When choosing linux as target OS, FTWA generate a shell script that will create a .desktop file and it's icons.
[0]: https://github.com/mathix420/free-the-web-apps?tab=readme-ov...
Thanks! Yes I didn't realized I don't speak about this on the website, good advice!
Pretty good! Just a few observations:
* The Firefox (BETA) entry does not work on default Ubuntu installs, where Firefox is a Snap. Yes, snap bad, bla bla bla, but it still remains one of the most likely way Firefox will be installed on Ubuntu. This comes from the fact that your script attempts to locate the profile folder in ~/.mozilla/firefox, whereas snaps stores them in ~/snap/firefox/common/.mozilla/firefox/.
* New profiles unfortunately don't share logins on Firefox, which means your app is disconnected at first. Not a big deal, but could maybe be changed by copying some things from the default profile ?
* Firefox does not display _any_ titlebar when ran in this way.
Love the idea. There's many times where I'd like something to have a bit more "privilege" on my toolbar than what a regular tab (even pinned) gets.
Since Mozilla has started to provide an official Debian-style repository there is no reason to use snap on Ubuntu any more. Well, except if some users don't know or don't care to switch.
>there is no reason to use snap on Ubuntu any more. Well, except if some users don't know or don't care to switch.
Also known as "90% of your users". Defaults stick, and there's nothing bad enough about snaps that i'd waste time of my day adding the debian repo, trying to switch my profiles over, etc.
Do you have a good summary of why snap is bad?
One aspect is that the server side is not free software. So only Canonical can reasonably host a repo of snaps.
That was enough for me not to look into the technical merits of the clientside implementation. The few experiences I had with snap was that programs were starting slowly (Firefox) and e.g. GPU acceleration did not work (vlc). Not sure how good the sandboxing is. But I run my Firefox sandboxed by firejail and the overhead can not be felt in daily usage.
Ubuntu has replaced the deb version of Firefox with Snaps a few times on my computer.
On at least 3 occasions, I became aware of this when I would open Firefox and nothing would happen, except a message that "Firefox is already running". The only resolution was to install the deb Firefox package.
A couple months ago, I needed to do a fresh install since my system got borked during the upgrade to 24.04 LTS. As usual, the Firefox snap package was installed, so I decided to give it a try.
To its credit, it actually works this time. However, it will not save images on right click or open Zoom meeting links in the desktop client. I am fairly certain this problem would disappear if I switched back to the deb package, but it's not a big enough hassle for me to bother. I can live with some workarounds for now.
Overall, I don't mind snaps, but the Firefox snap has been far more trouble than it's worth.
Thanks!
- Yes I could create a second firefox preset for snap installs - I would prefer not to touch such sensible files, but will give instructions on how to do it manually
I had written a similar program (but very barebone compared with what you've made), with Firefox only. The way I dealt with profile, is to specify the full path of the profile, rather than a name. This way, I don't have to know where Firefox is searching for profiles, and I can keep all the additional profiles in a separate directory, so they don't mix with normal profiles and don't clog up profile manager.
Yes I saw this option as well, but it seems that it's not possible for macOS
I just switched to Firefox and struggled with this exact functionality. The posted site ships a script for curl|sh that creates a new firefox profile with a custom userChrome.css.
There is an official thread here with people discussing how the single-page-as-an-app functionality should work: https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/how-can-firefox-c...
I ended up writing a firefox extension to open up URLs in a new "popup" window[1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/web-app-maker.... I just checked it on Windows (usually using linux) and the popup window type does not allow the maximize button to work. Oh well...
[1]https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/Web...
There's an excellent extension that makes this pretty simple to manage. Additionally the windows it creates have some pwa specific settings, like how links should be handled.
https://github.com/filips123/PWAsForFirefox/
Oh nice extension, will check if cohesion works with it, the SSO buttons are broken there
For people who want a "separate window" on Chrome osX (at least), you can go on the website, click on the "..." next to your profile picture, then "Cast, save and share" > "Install website as app"
It does the same, but runs as a "separate app" so that cmd+Q only exits the app
Yes, it's pretty much the same for macOS I guess. On linux it's pretty different, I was using .desktop files over PWAs for years because of their bad UI on Linux.
So I did this, turned out it's not only just Firefox without the browser UI, but it also bricked my actual Firefox browser and now it doesn't connect to the internet.
Oh pretty strange, could you please raise on issue on GitHub so I can have any chance of debugging this?
I would like to have the complete opposite. Turn any app into a website so that I don't need to download them, and can just access them through my browser.
With FTWA apps are still websites, it's just another way of opening them without distractions of the browser frame.
I think they’re saying that instead of having to try, for example, an iOS app by downloading it from the App Store, they prefer to visit a URL.
How would you then pay 30% Apple tax?! What a ridiculous idea!
Possibly Offtopic ...
I wanted Udemy app to be available for smart TV platforms like FireTV stick or SamsungTV.
Udemy makes an android and ios app but not for TVs.
Teachable is another online learning platform that ignores Android altogether and makes only an ios app.
LMS vendors like Docebo that have become very popular (AWS Skill Builder, Databricks academy, etc) have very poor mobile support.
Wonder if there is a way to make it work using tools like these. Any pointers in that direction would be appreciated.
How's this different from chrome browser's PWA install? https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/9658361?sjid=105106...
I believe the PWAs will correctly show up in the OS native app launchers.
It's different in the fact that PWAs needs to be setup by the website's developer.
Two questions:
1. Does this make the apps show up as separate windows in Alt+Tab and a Dock etc? (FWIW I use GNOME + Dash to dock + Wayland)
2. Let's say you have a mail app and you click a link. Does that link open in the separate default browser?
I remember trying these command line options for Brave/Chrome, but I couldn't find a way where both of the above were working and thus they didn't feel like proper apps. I've only been using this for something like Apple Music, where I never click on any link that takes me outside. For everything else, like mail and notes, I've been using pinned tabs, but that feels suboptimal too.
1. Yes
2. This could do the trick for you https://askubuntu.com/a/251738/1163389 make it point to the desktop file that ftwa created in this folder: ~/.local/share/applications
Mildly amused we keep reinventing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Prism
Kinda off topic but this is a "Linux First" UI application(?) and I love it.
If you are interested in using this then I can also highly recommend webapp manager.
https://github.com/linuxmint/webapp-manager
Why did you build this with a server? Since you suggest folks introspect the script anyway, you could simply generate it in the browser and have the user download it. Then you could run this at zero-cost.
Is this the “Add to Dock…” feature of Safari?
I also could not figure out the difference between FTWA and Safari's "Add to Dock..."? Is FTWA an equivalent meant for other platforms like Windows?
FTWA was created for linux in the first place. I then added support for macOS as requested, but yeah on macOS is pretty similar to PWAs.
Been using Unite for years — https://www.bzgapps.com/unite. It's a little better since v5, but it's still pretty buggy, which frustrates me.
Eager to try your product! Have you considered including it on SetApp?
I don't think it qualifies for SetApp, and I want to deliver ot freely.
This has been done a hundred times over.
This was just a side project, I was using .desktop files to launch some websites and thought it was still pretty unknown by most people. So I created this website.
I thought this would generate a mobile app APK containing a webview for the website
No that's exactly what I wanted to avoid, this would be similar to what electron does.
This used to be built into Brave: (Menu -> Save and Share -> Create Shortcut), then check the box.
They removed the option last August. It's really disappointing to me, because I'm a very heavy user.
Is this just a shortcut creator script with a landing page?
Basically yes, but the shortcut open a frameless browser.
I've had something similar that uses GitHub Actions and Tauri. github.com/meel-hd/limitss
That's neat!
Oh no, can we do the opposite please?
This is really cool! Any chance of adding support for the Arc browser? Right now, Chrome allows for some websites (WhatsApp, Spotify, YouTube Music) to be made into "apps" already via PWAs. Arc - which is based on chromium, for some mysterious reason, chooses to not support PWAs so this would be extremely useful for Arc!
Not what I was looking for. But looks interesting.
what's the point of this if it just duplicates the browser built in function of installing a PWA?
Not all websites are PWAs, and on linux those websites shows differently.
[dead]